Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Andrade v. Marceno et al
as 2:2019cv00887
Plaintiff:
Ashley Lynn Andrade
Defendant:
Joseph M. Clark, Carmine Marceno and Joseph Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 3:2019cv01412
Defendant:
Richard M. Clark, Administrative Law Judge, Bharath Raghukultilak, Loren Sweatt, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Health and Safety Administration and others
Plaintiff:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Clark v. Turner et al
as 4:2018cv04018
Defendant:
Randy Roller, Tina Hulsey, Laura Clemons and others
Plaintiff:
Shane M Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04746
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
***TRANSFERRED TO SD/TX HOUSTON DIV.***
as 1:2018cv00473
Defendant:
Randy Roller, Tina Hulsey, Laura Clemons and others
Plaintiff:
Shane M Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Millard et al
as 1:2018cv00457
Defendant:
Kathryn Diaz Garcia, Lisa A Millard, Chris Daniel and others
Plaintiff:
Shane M Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bucklew v. St Clair et al
as 3:2018cv02117
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bucklew
Defendant:
Officer M Clark, Officer Matt St Clair and City of Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00149
Plaintiff:
Timothy Clark, Georgia M. Clark and Shanice L. Oliver
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jacquelynne Clark-Russell, et al v. County of Alameda
as 17-17274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELYNNE M. CLARK-RUSSELL, KARRA LEWIS and KEVIN LEWIS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
