Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Al-Ali v. The Church of Jesus Christ, et al
as 19-4102
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, SALT LAKE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, MURRAY CITY and others
Claimant:
BRET JOHNSON, court administrator
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIHAD AL-ALI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv21825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Block v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Snohomish County, David Fontenot, Philip G Sayles and others
Plaintiff:
Anne K Block and Anne Block
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Ali v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, The et al
as 2:2018cv00845
Defendant:
Sean Reyes, Third District Court of Salt Lake County, Salt Lake County Public Defenders Office and others
Plaintiff:
Jihad Al-Ali
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hamre v. Sprout et al
as 0:2018cv02958
Defendant:
Officer Sprout, Fargo Forum, Robert Matheson and others
Plaintiff:
John Phillip Hamre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shavlik v. Snohomish County Superior Court et al
as 2:2018cv01094
Defendant:
Snohomish County, Snohomish County Superior Court, Sayles Law Firm PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lori Shavlik and Lori D Shavlik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamre v. Sprout et al
as 3:2018cv00138
Defendant:
Officer Sprout, Ryan Nelson, Robert Matheson and others
Plaintiff:
John Phillip Hamre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
