Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Kelly v. Obama
as 4:2012cv02344
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Kelly
Defendant:
Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Obama
as 4:2012cv02345
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Kelly
Defendant:
Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
George Johnson v. Philadelphia Housing Authority
as 11-3236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE E. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY and MICHAEL P. KELLY, Executive Director, In Their Individual As Well As Their Official Capacity
George Johnson v. Philadelphia Housing Authority
as 11-3237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE E. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY and MICHAEL P. KELLY, Executive Director, In Their Individual As Well As Their Official Capacity
JOHNSON v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2011cv04572
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY and MICHAEL P. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TATE v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2011cv00862
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY TATE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, DOROTHY BLOCKER, SONDRA NELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1437
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Type:
Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
