Cases 21 - 30 of 52
STOVALL v. GRAZIOLI et al
as 1:2016cv04839
Plaintiff:
FLAVIA STOVALL
Defendant:
JAMES GRAZIOLI , LOUIS NARVAEZ , GILBERTO VELASQUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B. et al v. Malloy et al
as 3:2016cv00065
Defendant:
Hartford Board of Education , Beth Schiavino-Narvaez , Dannel Malloy and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia B. and Tobias J.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cloutier v. Hartford Bd of Ed et al
as 3:2015cv01592
Plaintiff:
Patrick Cloutier
Defendant:
Hartford Bd of Ed, Beth Schiavino-Narvaez, David Goldblum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry v. The City of New York, et al
as 1:2015cv05871
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1 - 10, P.O. Anthony Narvaez and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Omar Harry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02173
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Justin Kelly v. Sarah Conner
as 15-1702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN SHERILL KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
SARAH H. CONNER, NORTH CAROLINA PRIVATE PROTECTION SERVICES BOARD, MICHAEL FORD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IIIPG Enterprises, Inc. et al v. City Of Laredo et al
as 5:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
IIIPG Enterprises, Inc. , Mario Sanchez and PedroPete Services, LLC
Defendant:
The City Of Laredo , Pete Saenz , Rudy Gonzalez, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Narvaez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv05734
Defendant:
City of New York, Anthony Sinacori, Christopher Noto and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Narvaez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
