Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Iverson v. Iverson et al
as 2:2017cv01241
Plaintiff:
Robert Iverson
Defendant:
Krista Michelle Iverson, Sean D. Reyes, State of Utah, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Charles Floyd, Jr. v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 17-2823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES FLOYD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, JUDGE ROBERT JENNINGS, III, NICOLAS J. LICATA and others
Hahn v. Reyes, et al
as 17-4067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY HAHN
Defendant - Appellee:
SEAN D. REYES, RYAN HARRIS, KIM M. LUHN and others
Rogers v. Richard et al
as 2:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
Kim Edward Rogers
Defendant:
M. Richard, Wesley J. Fish, Sean D. Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Houston et al
as 2:2016cv00924
Plaintiff:
Cameron Anderson
Defendant:
Eric J. Houston, Barry L. Huntington, Sean D. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Remick et al v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2016cv00789
Plaintiff:
Colton Guy Remick , Skylar W. Garner , Bryce Tucker Lloyd and others
Defendant:
State of Utah and Sean D. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hahn v. Reyes et al
as 2:2016cv00666
Plaintiff:
Randy Hahn
Defendant:
Sean D. Reyes, Ryan Harris, Kim M. Luhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Miller, et al v. Randall Meyer, et al
as 15-3702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY L. MILLER, JAMES E. LEHMAN, JR., MICHELE E. WARD-TACKETT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL MEYER, STATE OF OHIO OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, OFFICE OF BROWN COUNTY PROSECUTOR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
