Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv13560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vann v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv01058
Plaintiff:
Barnita P Vann
Defendant:
Catholic Bishop of Chicago, Nicholas Desmond, Thomas Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnson v. Moore
as 2:2011cv03132
Plaintiff:
Donald Earl Johnson
Defendant:
Betty Thomas Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv08883
Plaintiff:
Artemus Robinson and William Bracy
Defendant:
The City of New York , Yoosup Shim, Thomas Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon v. Moore et al
as 4:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
Darla Brandon
Defendant:
Thomas Moore , Pawnee County Sheriff and Pawnee County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00169
Plaintiff:
Thomas Moore
Defendant:
City of New York , Martin F. Horn, Carolyn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-4464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
O'Neal v. Moore
as 4:2009cv00942
Plaintiff:
Eric O'Neal
Defendant:
Thomas Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Suetta Smith v. County of Lenawee, et al
as 09-1703
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SUETTA SMITH, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Brenda Sue Smith, Deceased
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LENAWEE, LAWRENCE RICHARDSON, JR., Sheriff, PAUL DYE, Sgt. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS MOORE, Parole Agent
Smith v. Lenawee, County of et al
as 2:2009cv10648
Plaintiff:
Suetta Smith
Defendant:
Lenawee, County of, Lawrence Richardson, Jr, Paul Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
