Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01745
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv24430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Burge v. Allied Barton Security Services, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00932
Defendant:
Allied Barton Security Services, LLC, Bank of New York Mellon and Marty Hargrove
Plaintiff:
Michael Burge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SEDA et al v. BITTENBENDER et al
as 2:2010cv05951
Plaintiff:
BLANCA SEDA and JUAN SEDA
Defendant:
CARL S. BITTENBENDER , TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC. , TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY POLICE , ANTHONY BANKS , TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
ZULMA SEDA, ANTHONY BANKS , CARL S. BITTENBENDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
