Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Mujahid-Evora v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 13-1812
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL-QADEER ASADULLAH MUJAHID-EVORA
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, RI ATTORNEY GENERAL, A.T. WALL and others
Mujahid-Evora v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Qadeer Asdullah Mujahid-Evora
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, Attorney General's Office, Ashbel T. Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Querido v. Wall et al
as 1:2012cv00531
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Querido
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Matthew Kettle, Lt. Violante and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cynthia Mason-Ealy v. City of Pomona, et al
as 12-55968
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CYNTHIA MASON-EALY, an Individual
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF POMONA, a public entity, LEWIS, Officer, individually and in his capacity as a peace officer and DAVID S. KETTLE, Chief, public employees
Jesus Avila et al v. City of Pomona et al
as 2:2012cv00863
Plaintiff:
Jesus Avila, Maria Elena Avila and Estate of Andres Avila
Defendant:
City of Pomona, Does, Officer Gomez and others
Cynthia Mason-Ealy v. City of Pomona et al
as 2:2012cv00358
Defendant:
City of Pomona, Does, Chief David S Kettle and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Mason-Ealy
Mason et al v. Kettle Restaurants, Inc.
as 5:2011cv01291
Plaintiff:
James Mason and Joanne Pearson
Defendant:
Kettle Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. Kelly et al
as 2:2010cv00306
Plaintiff:
Kyle Hill
Defendant:
Dr Kelly and Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia Kettles v. Ruhlman
as 6:2009cv06402
Plaintiff:
Tracy Garcia Kettles
Defendant:
D'Andrea Ruhlman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kettles v. Piccone et al
as 6:2009cv06388
Plaintiff:
Tracy Garcia Kettles
Defendant:
Maureen Piccone and Evelyn Bianchi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
