Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Veal v. Michael J. Scott, P.C. et al
as 6:2010cv00323
Defendant:
Citibank and Michael J. Scott, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Joanna Veal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Scott et al v. Tipton County et al
as 2:2010cv02616
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Scott, Jr. , Judy Kinchen and Rachel Dunn
Defendant:
Tipton County, J.T. Poncho Chumley, Billy Daughtry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Norfolk Circuit Court et al
as 2:2010mc00010
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
Norfolk Circuit Court, Everett A. Martin, Jr., City of Norfolk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Szymanski v. Parks et al
as 2:2010cv00316
Plaintiff:
Christina M. Szymanski
Defendant:
Jason Parks and Michael J. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. US Bank, NA et al
as 2:2009cv00516
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
US Bank, NA, MERS Corporation, Inc., DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fields v. Scott et al
as 2:2009cv00529
Plaintiff:
Brett Fields and Brett Fields
Defendant:
Michael J. Scott and Prison Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Pfeffer v. Scott et al
as 2:2009cv00007
Plaintiff:
Kathleen J. Pfeffer
Defendant:
Michael Joseph Scott, John Eaton and Thomas Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pfeffer v. Scott et al
as 2:2008cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Pfeffer, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Joseph Scott, John Eaton and Thomas Chappell
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
