Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Glass v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2011cv00211
Defendant:
Bel Fury Investment Group, LLC, William Binkard, Wayne Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Leourieta B. Glass
MALDEF:
Mexico American Legal Defense & Educational Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosca v. Andron Construction Corp. et al
as 7:2011cv00610
Plaintiff:
Margaret Mosca
Defendant:
Andron Construction Corp. , Charles Winter, Sr. , Charles Winter,Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mark Wilson v. Mike Poulos, et al
as 10-56363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE POULOS, LORI DI CARLO, MATTHEW CATE and others
Hanson v. 5K Auto Sales, LLC et al
as 0:2010cv03094
Plaintiff:
Wendi L. Hanson
Defendant:
5K Auto Sales, LLC, Mohammad Sonbol, Larry Vitzloff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Wilson v. Mike Poulos, et al
as 10-55653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE POULOS, LORI DI CARLO, MATTHEW CATE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv05013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 (e)2(a) Family and Medical Leave Act
Wilson v. Poulos et al
as 3:2008cv01412
Plaintiff:
Mark Wilson
Defendant:
Mike Poulos, Lori Di Carlo, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Archunde et al v. Public Employees Retirement Association et al
as 1:2007cv00484
Plaintiff:
David Archunde, Jerome Armijo, David Bartram and others
Defendant:
Public Employees Retirement Association, Victor Montoya, Cynthia Borrego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
