Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Eaton et al v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2010cv12309
Defendant:
Detroit, City of , Tyrone Gray , Jelani Dew and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie J Eaton and Martez P Topp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv05101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv20722
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Stebelton v. Bloom Township Board of Zoning Appeals et al
as 2:2009cv00808
Plaintiff:
Robert Stebelton and Harold Stebelton
Defendant:
Bloom Township Board of Zoning Appeals, Bloom Township Trustees, Kimba Reinbold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Chavez v. Chavez et al
as 1:2009cv00280
Plaintiff:
Henry A Chavez
Defendant:
Martin J. Chavez, Ray Schultz, T McWhorter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James Smoak, et al v. Eric Hall, et al
as 09-5129
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES W. SMOAK, PAMELA Z. SMOAK and BRANDON HAYDEN
Defendant:
ERIC HALL, MEAD MCWHORTER, BRUCE LAMB and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID BUSH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James Smoak, et al v. Eric Hall, et al
as 08-5941
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES W. SMOAK, PAMELA Z. SMOAK and BRANDON HAYDEN
Defendant:
ERIC HALL, MEAD MCWHORTER, BRUCE LAMB and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID BUSH
James Smoak, et al v. Eric Hall, et al
as 08-5442
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES W. SMOAK, PAMELA Z. SMOAK and BRANDON HAYDEN
Defendant:
ERIC HALL, MEAD MCWHORTER, BRUCE LAMB and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID BUSH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv05501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
