Cases 31 - 40 of 474
Wood et al v. Mejia
as 6:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Wood and Jordan Wright
Defendant:
Priscilla Mejia and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mejia et al v. County of Rockland et al
as 7:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Rene Alvarado Mejia and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
County of Rockland, New York Unified Court System, Donna G. Siberman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Moy, Alexander v. Dane County et al
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Alexander Moy
Defendant:
Dane County and Lacey Mejia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montez v. Mejia et al
as 4:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Raymond Montez
Defendant:
Daniel Q. Mejia, Ray E. Williams and Kimberly Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv08976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mejia v. Merentie
as 3:2022cv01205
Plaintiff:
Brianna Mejia
Defendant:
Francesca Merentie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Mejia v. Birmingham City of et al
as 2:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
Clementina Ortiz Mejia
Defendant:
Birmingham City of, Brandon Jones and Luxe Ultra Lounge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
