Cases 31 - 40 of 891
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Anthony Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt and Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Defendant:
Anthony Anderson, Muhammad Ali Jr., Albuquerque International Support and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Securities Exchange Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jamil Abdul Muhammad
Defendant:
Securities Exchange Commission, Caryn Kaufman and Gary Geusler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Kane
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Walid A. Muhammad
Defendant:
Yvette Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
MOUZONE v. CITY OF PASSAIC et al
as 2:2023cv23420
Plaintiff:
KASSIM MOUZONE
Defendant:
CITY OF PASSAIC, PASSAIC COUNTY, JUDGE SOHAIL MUHAMMAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOGAN v. COLWYN BOROUGH et al
as 2:2023cv05160
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LOGAN
Defendant:
COLWYN BOROUGH, BOROUGH OF COLWYN, MAURICE J. CLARK, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. MUHAMMAD
as 2:2023cv05155
Plaintiff:
SHAWN BROWN
Defendant:
SAMEERAH MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Tennessee Valley Authority
as 3:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Joshua Fard Muhammad and Joshua Muhammad
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kalim Muhammad v. Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc., et al
as 23-14126
Plaintiff:
KALIM A.R. MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
WENDY'S OF BOWLING GREEN, INC., COWIN KNOWLES, CIARA DENNIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
