Cases 31 - 40 of 124
Rahim v. Thrash et al
as 9:2017cv00896
Plaintiff:
Ras Imhotep Rahim
Defendant:
Thomas Thrash, Jr, Jane Doe Thrash, Harold L Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Hedgpeth v. Ammar Rahim, et al
as 16-7146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jonathan Hedgpeth
Defendant - Appellee:
Ammar Rahim, District of Columbia Police Officer, individually and in his official capacity and Rider, DC Police Officer, individually and in his official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moody v. City of Delray Beach et al
as 9:2015cv81790
Plaintiff:
Pauline Moody
Defendant:
City of Delray Beach, State of Florida, Don Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HEDGPETH v. RAHIM et al
as 1:2015cv01228
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN HEDGPETH
Defendant:
AMMAR RAHIM and RIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerry Worlds & American Fair Gift Association, Inc. v. Cahalen et al
as 4:2014cv40158
Defendant:
Gannett Publications, Creditscore.com, Switchboard LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Worlds & American Fair Gift Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Abdal-Rahim v. Mutual Redevelopment Houses Inc et al
as 1:2014cv05985
Plaintiff:
Aladdin Abdal-Rahim
Defendant:
Mutual Redevelopment Houses Inc and New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
