Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZITTER v. PETRUCCELLI et al
as 1:2015cv06488
Plaintiff:
MARC ZITTER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER PETRUCCELLI, BRIAN TOMLIN, JASON SNELLBAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Irvin v. Clarksville Department of Electricity/CDE et al
as 3:2015cv00782
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
Clarksville Department of Electricity/CDE, Clarksville, Tennesse City of and Kim McMillan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas, v. Alvarado, et al
as 1:2015cv03568
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas
Defendant:
Adam Wis, Marco Alvarado, Mozale McHenry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. State of Illinois
as 2:2015cv02039
Plaintiff:
Greg Hill
Defendant:
State of Illinois, James Lane, Loretto Lemken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Irvin v. United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit et al
as 3:2014cv01844
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Deborah S. Hunt, The State of Tennessee Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PANKIEWITZ v. BOROUGH OF TUCKERTON et al
as 3:2014cv05583
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS PANKIEWITZ
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF TUCKERTON, CHIEF OF POLICE MICHAEL CAPUTO, JOSEPH LUNA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
