Cases 31 - 40 of 696
Finley et al v. Sublette County Circuit Court Judge et al
as 1:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Finley Jamison-Daniel, Jamison D Vanderhagen and Jamison Daniel Finley
Defendant:
Sublette County Circuit Court Judge, Detective Terrel, United States Drug Enforcement Agency Detective and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
Giles v. City of Chicago
as 1:2023cv04170
Plaintiff:
Steve Terrell Giles
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Horace et al v. City of Richardson Texas et al
as 3:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
Terrell Horace and Frankie Bibles
Defendant:
City of Richardson Texas, Kantrelle Lyles and Brian Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Terrell v. Harris County
as 23-20281
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shanita Terrell
Defendant / Appellee:
Harris County, Michael Hines, Mark Cannon and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
