Cases 31 - 40 of 463
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16026
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant:
THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction, LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae:
MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Dawson v. Buckner et al (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Megan E. Dawson
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner, Allison Bryars, Stephanie Glispee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
K.C., et al v. Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Board, et al
as 23-2366
Plaintiff / Appellee:
K.C., NATHANIEL CLAWSON, BETH CLAWSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, LINDSAY HYER, Executive Director, Indiana Professional Licensing Agency, TODD ROKITA, Attorney General of the State of Indiana and others
Amicus Curiae:
FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 23-1719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARYLAND SHALL ISSUE, INCORPORATED, ENGAGE ARMAMENT LLC, ANDREW RAYMOND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Jane Doe 1, et al v. William Thornbury, Jr., et al
as 23-5609
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE 1, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN MINOR DOE 1, by and through his next friend, Jane Doe 1 and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. THORNBURY, JR., MD, in his official capacity as the President of the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, et al.
Intervenor:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY EX REL. ATTORNEY GENERAL DANIEL CAMERON
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF ALASKA and others
L. W., et al v. Jonathan Skrmetti, et al
as 23-5600
Plaintiff / Appellee:
L. W., by and through her parents and next friends, Samantha Williams and Brian Williams, SAMANTHA WILLIAMS, BRIAN WILLIAMS and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN THOMAS SKRMETTI, in his official capacity as the Tennessee Attorney General and Reporter, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, RALPH ALVARADO, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Health and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Dickerson et al v. Noland Hospital et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Kenita Dickerson and Madesa Dickerson
Defendant:
Noland Hospital and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mason v. Knox et al
as 1:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Patrick Leon Mason
Defendant:
Sharla Knox, State Of Alabama DHR, CSE, Frank Spraglin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dickerson et al v. Ray et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Madesa Dickerson and Kenita Dickerson
Defendant:
Terrance Wade Ray and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe 1 et al v. Thornbury et al
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Minor Doe 1 and others
Defendant:
William C. Thornbury, Jr., Audria Denker and Eric Friedlander
Intervenor Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky ex rel. Attorney General Daniel Cameron
Amicus Curiae:
American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Academic Pediatric Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
