Cases 31 - 40 of 486
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-60311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
RBL Financial v. Toole et al
as 1:2023cv01650
Plaintiff:
RBL Financial and RBL Financial LLC
Defendant:
Sara Toole, Main 434, Ikon Funding and others
Interested Party:
Angelique Layton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Crisp v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Tuwanda Rush Williams, Brittanie Browning, David D. Pritchett and others
Plaintiff:
Sergeant Nathan D. Crisp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nathan Crisp v. The State of Georgia, et al
as 21-14190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SERGEANT NATHAN D. CRISP
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA, GWINNETT COUNTY, MS. TOOLE, Gwinnett County Assistant District Attorney and others
Crisp v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv02057
Plaintiff:
Sergeant Nathan D. Crisp
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, State Employee Scot W. Schunk, State Employee ADA Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nathan Crisp v. The State of Georgia, et al
as 23-10625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN D. CRISP
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA, SCOT W. SCHUNK, TOOLE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
