Cases 41 - 50 of 2,864
EZEKWO v. MOISE et al
as 2:2024cv04204
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
GERALD MOISE, SUSAN K. BOLLMAN, NORAH E. BRINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chounlamontry et al v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Mike Chounlamontry and Arthur of the Family Wittenberg Trustee
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation Stan Moscowitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Barnes v. Spirit AeroSystems Inc
as 2:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Arthur Barnes
Defendant:
Spirit AeroSystems Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01080
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc, Molly Smith, Arthur William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas, Martha Islas Enriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
