Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Udell v. Martin County Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2015cv14252
Plaintiff:
Spencer Lee Udell
Defendant:
Martin County Sheriff Office , William D. Snyder , Justin Frank Albauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv03084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DESALIS v. GLOUCESTER CITY et al
as 1:2013cv01933
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DESALIS
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER CITY , JOSEPH ELLER , CARL DEPODER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Reisinger v. Conner et al
as 3:2012cv02553
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Reisinger
Defendant:
Richard L. Conner, Prashant Shitut , Joseph Butkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reisinger v. Connor et al
as 3:2012cv02117
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Reisinger
Defendant:
Richard L. Connor, Prashant Shitut, Joseph Butkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANTONELLI et al v. GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2012cv04221
Plaintiff:
JAY ANTONELLI, JESSICA ANTONELLI, L.A. and others
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, KENNETH IEPSON, JOSEPH ELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert James Woods v. State of California et al
as 2:2012cv04321
Defendant:
Chief J Abele, Chief J Abele, J Aboy and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James Woods
Miller v. Joan Long Eller Investment Company, LLC
as 6:2011cv03513
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Miller
Defendant:
Joan Long Eller Investment Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
