Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Parker v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01143
Plaintiff:
Jamal Darius Parker Moor beneficiary, Jamal El Trust doing business as Jamal Darius Parker also known as Jamal El Trust and Jamal El Trust
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Michigan, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JARVIS v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv01523
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
DEREK N. JARVIS
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv04445
Defendant:
President Donald J. Trump, Comm. Andrew Saul, United States of America (GOV) and others
Plaintiff:
Keith S. Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCNEIL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2021cv02208
Defendant:
IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC., JOHN MORENZ, LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Navarro v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv00382
Defendant:
United States Internal Revenue Service, Sostenes Joseph Flores, Robert Wilkie and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Navarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed
Smith v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
Ms Ranada A. Smith and Ranada Antoinette Smith
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 id
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
