Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Funk et al v. Social Services Agency - Alameda County et al
as 3:2016cv06960
Plaintiff:
Bruce C Funk and Cindy A Diamond
Defendant:
Social Services Agency - Alameda County, County of Alameda, The, Lori A. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Kleinman et al v. Social Services Agency - Alameda County et al
as 3:2016cv06961
Plaintiff:
Deena Kleinman , Roland Kleinman and David Duarte
Defendant:
Social Services Agency - Alameda County, The County of Alameda, Lori A. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Winkler et al
as 1:2016cv01006
Plaintiff:
Robert Young
Defendant:
Randall Winkler , James Lickliter , Jake Fryman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rudebush, Damien v. Rudebush, Barb
as 3:2015cv00446
Plaintiff:
Damien Marcus Rudebush
Defendant:
Barb Rudebush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samar Akins v. Gretchen Eurie, et al
as 15-1953
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Samar Akins
Defendant - Appellee:
Gretchen Eurie, NEOC, Barb Albers, Sup., NECO, Cindy King, Director, NEOC and others
Samar Akins v. Barb Albers, et al
as 15-1950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Samar Akins
Defendant - Appellee:
Barb Albers, Lynn Quizner, Rod Confer and others
Samar Akins v. Barb Albers, et al
as 15-1590
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Samar Akins
Defendant - Appellee:
Barb Albers, Gretchin Eurie, Kimberly Taylor Riley and others
Stojcevski et al v. Macomb, County of et al
as 2:2015cv11019
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Stojcevski and David Stojcevski
Defendant:
Macomb, County of, Anthony M. Wickersham, Michelle M Sanborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
