Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Williams et al v. Canning et al
as 2:2013cv00631
Plaintiff:
Sandra Williams and Karen Burton
Defendant:
Joseph M. Canning , SOL Homes, LLC , Dare Delorefice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
DARE v. TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON et al
as 1:2013cv01636
Plaintiff:
JASON D. DARE
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON , STACY TAPPEINER , CHRISTOPHER GEHRING and others
Counter_claimant:
JAMES A. ESPOSITO , TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON , CHRISTOPHER GEHRING and others
Counter_defendant:
JASON D. DARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01807
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Peterson v. Midgett et al
as 2:2012cv00060
Defendant:
Rodney Midgett, John Douglas Doughtie, Dare County and others
Plaintiff:
James F Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01312
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jeffrey Gorman v. City of San Diego, et al
as 12-56139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY GORMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM LANSDOWNE, as an individual and as Chief of Police of City of San Diego and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bishop v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2011cv01804
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Bishop
Defendant:
Susan I. Hamilton, Dare Family Services, Inc., Twanda Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Hamilton et al
as 3:2011cv01804
Plaintiff:
Gwen Bishop
Defendant:
Susan I. Hamilton, Dare Family Services, Inc., Twanda Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
