Cases 41 - 50 of 584
MUCHISON v. JP MORGAN CHASE
as 2:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
IALIK MUCHISON
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thomas Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
as 22-2942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Rimini
Defendant / Appellee:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Securities, LLC, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
as 22-2941
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Rimini
Defendant / Appellee:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Securities, LLC, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Dames v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2022cv06962
Plaintiff:
Marquis Dames
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and Noemi Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Antonello Boldrini v. Ktt, et al
as 22-3015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONELLO BOLDRINI
Defendant:
KTT, Jane Doe, personally in her official capacity of Director of Operations, SIEDEL, John Doe (D), personally and in his official capacity as U.S. Marshal Guard, CHRIS HILL, U.S.M. 2019-2022, personally and his official capacity as USM Detective and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ellis v. State of Arizona et al
as 2:2022cv01480
Plaintiff:
Michael G Ellis
Defendant:
State of Arizona, JP Morgan Chase, Thomas Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 22-30611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
JP Morgan Chase Bank and Deon Morris, L.L.P.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
