Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 34,500
Canario v. The County Of Rockland et al
as 1:2024cv04470
Defendant: The County Of Rockland, The Rockland County District Attorney's Office, Thomas E. Walsh, II and others
Plaintiff: Raymond Canario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06902
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Duncan v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv04438
Plaintiff: Branden Duncan
Defendant: City of New York, Officer Amir, Officer Wildania Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Birdo v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2024cv01210
Plaintiff: Kevin Birdo
Defendant: John Doe #1, Kimberly Gibson, Aaron Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00423
Plaintiff: Ralph Jordan
Defendant: John Doe, Niyombi Marshall, Malik Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Billy Tyler v. John Doe
as 24-2166
Plaintiff: Billy Roy Tyler
Defendant: John Doe, Unknown Officers of Bellevue Police Department
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02496
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Davis et al v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02496
Plaintiff: Onika Davis
Defendant: Naphcare, Inc., Fulton County, Georgia, Sheriff Patrick Labat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Wrongful Death
Henry v. John Doe 1-3 et al
as 1:2024cv04143
Plaintiff: Adonis Henry
Defendant: John Doe 1-3, NYPD Officers 1 & 2 and Family Court Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Janathaen Strum v. Shane Abreo, et al
as 24-11926
Plaintiff: JANATHAEN STRUM
Defendant: SHANE ABREO, JEFFREY BRIDGES, COLUMBUS CHIEF OF POLICE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?