Cases 41 - 50 of 5,013
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05906
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Simmons v. City of Rochester et al
as 1:2024cv00720
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and City of Rochester
Plaintiff:
Timothy Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05680
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Morales v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv05210
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and Matthew Reich
Plaintiff:
Courtney Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J.B.C v. Athens Area School District et al
as 4:2024cv01249
Defendant:
Craig J. Stage, ED.D, Christopher Mitchell, William Clark and others
Plaintiff:
J.B.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dannan v. City of Yakima et al
as 1:2024cv03111
Defendant:
City of Yakima, Yakima Police Department and John and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Dominic Dannan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11897
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Warren v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv05085
Defendant:
Michael Goldstein, Charles King, Michael Paccione and others
Plaintiff:
David Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv07909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Callahan v. Village of Dobbs Ferry et al
as 7:2024cv05399
Defendant:
Dobbs Ferry Police Department, Detective Jeffrey Jee, John or Jane Doe 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Callahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
