Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Foster v. New Mexico Highlands University Center at Rio Rancho et al
as 1:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
Carl G. Foster
Defendant:
New Mexico Highlands University Center at Rio Rancho , Board of Regents, Gilbert Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv11478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-2405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MA ROCKPORT, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-2405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROCKPORT, MA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Steven Montes v. State of Arizona, et al
as 12-16515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN ARTHUR MONTES
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, CITY OF TUCSON, COUNTY OF PIMA and others
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-1523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MA ROCKPORT, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
Gross v. Samudio et al
as 1:2011cv02594
Plaintiff:
Dale Gross
Defendant:
Guillermo Samudio, Ian Sweeney, Jennifer Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport et al
as 1:2011cv11073
Plaintiff:
James Atkinson
Defendant:
Town of Rockport, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Salem State College and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Montes v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
Steven Arthur Montes
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Tucson, City of, Pima, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
