Cases 41 - 50 of 241
Boldrini v. Jane Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Ms KTT Jane Doe, Mr. Siedel John Doe (D), Mr. Chris Hill, U.S.M.2019-2022 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Tanner Roth, et al v. Lloyd Austin, III, et al
as 22-2058
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tanner W. Roth, Jon W. Smithley, Logan M. Priebe and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Defense, United States Department of Defense, Frank Kendall, III, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Air Force and others
Ponce v. United States
as 22-1087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Ponce
Defendant / Appellee:
United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Isai Munoz v. Blanca Buenrostro Diaz
as 22-11466
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ISAI PONCE MUNOZ
Defendant / Appellant:
BLANCA ESTELA BUENROSTRO DIAZ
Wilson v. Ponce Ground Service LLC
as 2:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Jamalh Wilson and Jamalh Anthony Wilson
Defendant:
Ponce Ground Service LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ponce v. United States
as 1:2022cv02532
Plaintiff:
Jose Ponce
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00531
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
