Cases 41 - 50 of 263
David Rowland Manuel v. The United States
as 2:2022cv06555
Petitioner:
David Rowland Manuel
Respondent:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bravenec v. Martin
as 22-2191
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EDWARD BRAVENEC, et al.
Defendant / Appellant:
ROWLAND J. MARTIN, JR.
Houston v. City of Fairfield et al
as 2:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Danielle N. Houston
Defendant:
City of Fairfield, Jerriod Mack, Joshua Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. City of Fairfield et al
as 2:2022at00620
Plaintiff:
Danielle N. Houston
Defendant:
City of Fairfield, Jerriod Mack, Joshua Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edward Bravenec, et al. v. Martin
as 5:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Edward Bravenec, et al.
Defendant:
Rowland J. Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Lewis et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00423
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Lewis, BBYW Holdings LLC, Manumitted Indigenous American Heir Tribal Members and others
Defendant:
Scott Jones, Russell L. Hom, Lloyd Connley Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowland v. Matevousian
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Dustin Alan Rowland
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Story v. Walton et al
as 1:2021cv03050
Plaintiff:
Alan R. Story
Defendant:
Benjamin Terrell Walton, Todd Sorenson, Curtis Brammer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Endicott v. Choctaw County City of Hugo Hospital Authority et al
as 6:2021cv00319
Defendant:
Velvet Bullard, Choctaw County City of Hugo Hospital Authority, Eric Hogan and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Endicott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
