Cases 41 - 50 of 1,323
Quizel Welsh v. United States, et al
as 24-1003
Plaintiff:
Quizel Welsh, "I Am That I Am"
Defendant:
United States of America, Ghan & Cooper Commercial Properties, Kathleen Caldarrera, Partner and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Williams v. Pulaski, County of et al
as 4:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Khakeem Marquis Williams
Defendant:
Pulaski, County of, Eric Higgins, Mark Swaggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Young (PS) v. Canvas at Castle Rock et al
as 1:2023cv03141
Plaintiff:
Maverick A. Young
Defendant:
Canvas at Castle Rock, Cottonwood Hollow, Tscheutter Sulzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
de Lanerolle v. Board of Trustees of the Illinois State Universities Retirement System et al
as 2:2023cv02261
Plaintiff:
Primal de Lanerolle
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of the Illinois State Universities Retirement System, Collin Van Meter, Andriy Bodnaruk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jon'Ta Hampton-Bey v. Blowing Rock Police Department
as 23-2187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JON'TA HAMPTON-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BLOWING ROCK POLICE DEPARTMENT and JONATHAN HAYES
Rocks v. Arbolus US Inc.
as 1:2023cv09914
Plaintiff:
Kynan Rocks
Defendant:
Arbolus US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
