Cases 41 - 50 of 696
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Giles v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv03070
Plaintiff:
Steve Terrell Giles
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections and Vandalia Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roberts v. Barnwell et al
as 6:2023cv06243
Plaintiff:
Chavana Roberts
Defendant:
Ruth Barnwell, Christopher McClary, Q'asia Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crowell v. Obion County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Hailey Crowell
Defendant:
Obion County, Tennessee, Karl Jackson and Terrell Clinic, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terrell Dismukes v. Kyle Lerch
as 23-1789
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRELL DISMUKES
Defendant / Appellee:
KYLE LERCH
Ellis v.County of Hamilton, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Defendant:
Hamilton County Government, Bryan Sinclair Ellis, County of Hamilton, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brown v. Kaufman County
as 23-10387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas G. Brown and Ella H. Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
Kaufman County, City of Terrell, Texas, Jeff Brown and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jordan v. Bush et al
as 1:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Prince Terrell Darron Jordan and Prince Terrell Darron Jordan, r
Defendant:
Former President George W Bush, Former President Bill Clinton and Former First Lady Hillary Clinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
