Cases 41 - 50 of 258
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas Sutton v. Secretary United States Department of Veterans Aff, et al
as 23-1414
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS SUTTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, FAYETTE EMS, JW RUBY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hampton v. Wilkie
as 23-305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Hampton
Defendant / Appellee:
Denis Richard McDonough, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1417
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bienvenue v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Benjamin J. Bienvenue
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Brian v United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Connell R Brian, Department of Veterans Affairs and Brian Connell
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Blackmer v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
David Charles Blackmer
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Veterans Affairs Hospital, Raner C Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
