Cases 51 - 60 of 386
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BUVEL et al v. BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO.
as 3:2022cv06449
Plaintiff:
LYNDA BUVEL, JOY M CORSON, DAN KALIE and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Orlando v. Smith et al
as 5:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Samuel Joseph Orlando
Defendant:
Sheriff Donald L. Smith, Major Brian Jenkins, Bristol Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
as 2:2022cv06097
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv06013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Laviero v. Bristol
as 22-2335
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rosemarie Laviero
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Bristol, Walter Veselka, P.E., P.W.L.F., Raymond A. Rogozinski, P.E. and others
Defendant:
The Hanover Insurance Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Klaneski v. Bristol Hospital, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01158
Plaintiff:
Rosa Lee Klaneski
Defendant:
Bristol Hospital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
