Cases 51 - 60 of 735
Bul v. Rutho et al
as 1:2023cv10064
Plaintiff:
David Bul
Defendant:
Mr Rutho, Ms Penny Perry, Mr Malera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Toshalyn Murray v. Tom Pyle, et al
as 23-3016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOSHALYN MURRAY
Defendant:
TOM PYLE
Defendant / Appellee:
ATHENS COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ATHENS COUNTY, OH CHILDREN SERVICES, ATHENS CITY, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
K.J. v. City of Waseca et al
as 0:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
K. J. and K.J.
Defendant:
City of Waseca, Police Chief Penny Vought, Police Officer Andrew Harren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Batteau v. Pierson et al
as 3:2022cv03145
Plaintiff:
Sara J. Batteau
Defendant:
Penny J Pierson, Joseph A. Cervantez and Jackson County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hulett v. Johnson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2022cv04065
Plaintiff:
TC Hulett, Jr
Defendant:
Johnson County Sheriff's Office, Penny Postoak Ferguson, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16776
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shampine v. Bell et al
as 1:2022cv01753
Plaintiff:
Latefah Shampine
Defendant:
Jeffrey Keith Bell, Penny Cousper Dainel, Magistrate Richard Gedeon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lucious v. Mclaughlin
as 3:2022cv01261
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Lucious
Defendant:
Pennie K. Mclaughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
