Cases 51 - 60 of 87
Thomas v. Hudak et al
as 1:2013cv05684
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas
Defendant:
Matthew Hudak, Terrance O'Brien, John Cichy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flanagan v. Thomas, et al
as 5:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Andrew Roy Flanagan
Defendant:
Robert Thomas, Brett Moody, Rebecca Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Thomas v. Yuchasz et al
as 2:2012cv13548
Plaintiff:
Pat Robert Thomas
Defendant:
Ypsilanti, City of , Amy F Walker , Deric Gress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Oregon State Police et al
as 6:2012cv01167
Defendant:
John Does 1-4, Oregon Parks & Recreation Department, Oregon State Police and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
David Parnell et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 2:2012cv03712
Defendant:
Robert Cornett, County of Riverside, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Marels and David Parnell
Robert Irvin v. Clarksville Gas & Water Depart, et al
as 12-5383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARKSVILLE GAS & WATER DEPARTMENT, CITY OF CLARKSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, PAT HICKET, CGWD General Manager and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02027
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Irvin v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Montgomery County, Tennessee, City of Clarksville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
