Cases 61 - 70 of 106
Adams v. The City of New York
as 12-4423
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Courtney Lee Adams, Thomas Adamson, Chris Agnese and others
Defendant - Appellant:
The City of New York, James Essig, Joseph Lamendola and others
Gregory Adamson v. Michael Hayes, et al
as 12-17336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY K. ADAMSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HAYES, Tempe Police Officer, C WATTS, Tempe Police Officer, D. DOLLARHIDE, Tempe Police Officer and others
Simmons et al v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2012cv01127
Plaintiff:
Steven A Simmons and Consuelo M Simmons
Defendant:
State of Missouri , Jackson County , Division of Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Adamson et al v. Clayton County Elections and Registration Board et al
as 1:2012cv01665
Plaintiff:
Pam Adamson , Wanda Smith , Ophelia Burroughs and others
Defendant:
Clayton County Elections and Registration Board , Robert P. Bolia , Patricia Pullar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv30068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chapman v. United States [central] government
as 0:2011cv61969
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chapman and Roanne Eye
Defendant:
United States [central] government, Federico A. Moreno, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Adamson v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2011cv00663
Plaintiff:
Zachary Adamson
Defendant:
City of Buffalo , City of Buffalo Police Department , Joseph Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
