Cases 61 - 70 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv09078
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Witherspoon v. Duns & Bradstreet et al
as 1:2015cv06543
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Defendant:
Duns & Bradstreet, Dave & Busters, Asis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witherspoon v. Cipha Sounds et al
as 1:2015cv05066
Defendant:
Thomi Blaze, United States District Court, Josline Hernandez and others
Debtor:
D.J. Lius and Baby Swins
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas Howell v. Town of Ball, et al
as 15-30552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS R. HOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF BALL, DANIEL CALDWELL, in his official capacity as Police Chief for the Town of Ball, ROGER TONEY, in his official capacity as former Mayor of the Town of Ball and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thirdparty_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sandberg v. Rudd, et al
as 4:2015cv00468
Defendant:
C. R. Rudd , MarqE GP Company, LLC , Fidelis Realty Partners, LTD and others
Plaintiff:
John Edward Sandberg, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00465
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Charles Boyd v. Stanley Sniff et al
as 5:2014cv01164
Defendant:
Marion Ashley, John Benoit, Robert Buster and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
