Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 415
Poa et al v. City of Dubuque, Iowa et al
as 3:2023cv00002
Plaintiff: Shayna Poa and Tremayne Clark
Defendant: City of Dubuque, Iowa, Dubuque Police Department, Dubuque County Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Vitagliano v. County of Westchester We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-30
Plaintiff / Appellant: Debra A. Vitagliano
Defendant / Appellee: County of Westchester
Defendant: George Latimer, George Latimer, in his official capacity as County Executive of the County of Westchester and John M. Nonna, John M. Nonna, in his official capacity as County Attorney of the County of Westchester
Burnam et al v. Weld County Sheriffs, The et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00151
Plaintiff: Eric Burnam, Erin Cienfuegos and Michelle Erickson
Defendant: Weld County Sheriffs, The, Department of Human Services of Weld County, The, County Attorneys Office of Weld County, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronnie Todd v. Ryan Todd, et al
as 22-3366
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant: RYAN RAMAEL TODD, Estate, Beneficiary Ryan Ramael Todd, CHRISTINE RIDLEY, Estate, Beneficiary Christine Ridley, ROONEY TODD, Estate, Beneficiary Rooney Todd and others
Defendant / Appellee: JEROME BLACKWELL, Estate, Beneficiary, ANTHONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, MARK BRNOVICH, Arizona Attorney General and others
Tennant et al v. State of Iowa et al
as 3:2022cv00083
Plaintiff: Kenneth Charles Tennant and Gregory Francis Tennant
Defendant: State of Iowa, Iowa State Bar Association, Attorney General of State of Iowa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Andrea Sanders v. Hennepin Co. Human Services, et al
as 22-3410
Plaintiff / Appellant: Andrea Lee Sanders
Defendant / Appellee: Hennepin County Human Services and Public Health Department, Child Support Enforcement, Michael Freeman, Office of Hennepin County Attorney Child Support Enforcement Division MC (891), Mississippi Department of Human Services, Child Support Enforcement and others
Theodore Roberts, et al v. Robert Neace, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-5985
Plaintiff / Appellee: THEODORE JOSEPH ROBERTS, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated, RANDALL DANIEL, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated and SALLY O'BOYLE, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated
Defendant: ROBERT D. NEACE, only as Boone County, KY attorney on behalf of all other county attorneys
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREW G. BESHEAR, in his official capacity as the Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky and SECRETARY ERIC FRIEDLANDER
A.K.M., et al v. Arlington County Virginia Child Protective Serv, et al
as 22-3112
Plaintiff / Appellant: A. K. M., minor fraternal brothers, by and through GWYNNETH MOOLENAAR, maternal grandmother and next friend, I. R. M., minor fraternal brothers, by and through GWYNNETH MOOLENAAR, maternal grandmother and next friend and GWENNETH MOOLENAAR, As Maternal Grandmother and Next Friend
Defendant / Appellee: ARLINGTON COUNTY VIRGINIA CHID PROTECTIVE SERVICES, GEORGE D. VAROUTSOS, Chief Judge of the Arlington County Juvenile and Domestic Relations, KAREN GRANE, Assistant County Attorney and others
TODD v. RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv04777
Plaintiff: RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant: RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE, Not Named Graham Estate, CHRISTINE RIDLEY ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oates El v. United States Treasury Department, The et al
as 0:2022cv02907
Plaintiff: Lovell Nahmour Oates El
Defendant: United States Treasury Department, The, State of Minnesota, State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?