Cases 61 - 70 of 601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LaFua v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv02133
Plaintiff:
Rayven LaFua
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Kashif Summers and Kristine Buist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Shannon v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07025
Plaintiff:
Rasaan Shannon
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodwin v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07043
Plaintiff:
Darnell Goodwin
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaines v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07052
Plaintiff:
Brian Gaines
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Robert Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv06995
Plaintiff:
Anthony Baker
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Willis v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv06996
Plaintiff:
Dexter Willis
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Breeland v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv06975
Plaintiff:
Vernell Breeland
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-30763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
