Cases 61 - 70 of 116
Long v. County of Montgomery, Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv01276
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Long, Jr.
Defendant:
County of Montgomery, Tennessee and John Fuson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gerhard Sweetman v. Borough of Norristown, et al
as 13-3540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERHARD SWEETMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF NORRISTOWN, COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
LANDLORD MICHAEL SIMON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GOCHIN v. WALL et al
as 2:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
DIANE R. GOCHIN
Defendant:
KELLY C. WALL, ARTHUR TILSON, MINDY HARRIS, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cressy v. County of Montgomery et al
as 6:2012cv01900
Plaintiff:
Richard Cressy
Defendant:
County of Montgomery, William Gilston and Michael Amato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cressy v. County of Montgomery et al
as 6:2012cv01877
Plaintiff:
Margie Cressy
Defendant:
County of Montgomery, William Gilston and Michael Amato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv05714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
HASTY v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2012cv04335
Plaintiff:
JAMES HASTY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY , CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CARE, INC. , MARGARET CARILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chute et al v. Odom et al
as 3:2012cv00607
Plaintiff:
David Edward Chute and Kathleen Patricia Chute
Defendant:
Jereme Odom , Cape Taylor , Tim Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kroll v. Vazzi et al
as 3:2012cv03153
Plaintiff:
Steven A Kroll
Defendant:
Jim Vazzi and County of Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
