Cases 61 - 70 of 864
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Transcon Industries, LLC et al v. Town of Hilton Head Island, The et al
as 9:2023cv03142
Plaintiff:
Transcon Industries, LLC and RAC Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Town of Hilton Head Island, The, Town of Hilton Head Island Town Council, The and Tamara Becker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warren v. Yamhill County et al
as 3:2023cv00911
Plaintiff:
Renee Warren
Defendant:
Yamhill County, Tim Svenson, Michael Petrasek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ernster v. City of Mt. Washington, KY et al
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Tamara Ernster
Defendant:
City of Mt. Washington, KY, Bradley Aubin, Mark Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-40361
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv05019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
SAKATU et al v. VIRGIN ISLANDS OF THE UNITED ST ATES et al
as 1:2023cv01601
Plaintiff:
MAKURIJA SAKATU and MAIPURI ARAUAN NATION
Defendant:
VIRGIN ISLANDS OF THE UNITED ST ATES, CONNAL RIVIERA ALFRED FIRST BANK, DENISE GEORGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
