Cases 61 - 70 of 155
Julian Boss v. City of Mesa, et al
as 17-17255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN BOSS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MESA, THOMAS E. DENNING, Detective, City of Mesa Police Department, J. R. GOMEZ, in his individual capacity as a sergeant with the City of Mesa Police Department and others
BRETT v. MENENDEZ et al
as 3:2017cv09457
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
ROBERT MENENDEZ, SOLOMON MELGIN, PAUL MARSELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2017cv03314
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
SETH WILLIAMS, CAPE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER "THE BOSS, DAVID SAMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Lambert et al
as 0:2017cv61368
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Watson
Defendant:
Al Lambert, John Lewis, Robert Resnick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akinyi v. Coome et al
as 1:2017cv02306
Plaintiff:
Benter Akinyi
Defendant:
Mrs. Coome, Mr. Wilfredo Fuentes, Jr. and The "Boss"
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Akinyi v. Coome et al
as 1:2017cv02523
Plaintiff:
Benter Akinyi
Defendant:
Coome, Wilfredo Fuentes, Jr. and The "Boss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. State of Oregon Department of Justice et al
as 6:2017cv00504
Defendant:
Frederick Boss, Ellen Rosenblum and State of Oregon Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
James R Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brett v. Baker et al
as 6:2017cv00376
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
David Baker, Bill Naully, David Samson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AKAN v. SUMMERS et al
as 2:2017cv00089
Plaintiff:
AKANINYENE EFIONG AKAN
Defendant:
ADAM SUMMERS, NEIL REINSFELDER, STEVEN CENTRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
East v. Bunich et al
as 2:2016cv00483
Plaintiff:
Lorraine C East
Defendant:
John Bunich, Officer Kraus, Sgt Bosse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
