Cases 71 - 80 of 17,224
Palacios v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03614
Plaintiff:
Adam Palacios and John and Jane Doe 1 through 15
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Windsor v. Orinda Evans, et al
as 24-11670
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant:
JUDGE ORINDA D. EVANS, JUDGE WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., JUDGE JULIE E. CARNES and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jane Doe v. Pine Richland School District
as 24-1898
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
PINE RICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Moore *RESTRICTED FILER* v. Monroe County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Garry Lee Moore *RESTRICTED FILER*
Defendant:
Monroe County Detention Facility, Monroe County, MS, Board of Supervisors, Kevon Crook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Cuyahoga County et al.
as 1:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County, Cuyahoga County Council, MetroHealth System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Farrell v. Harrell et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael Farrell
Defendant:
Mark Harrell, Larry Nixon and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Defendant:
Matthew Pynn, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Office of Court Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Hardwick et al
as 3:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Robert A. Hardwick, Matthew Cline, Joshua Woolsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
