Cases 71 - 80 of 138
Martin-Trigona v. Cruz-Munoz et al
as 1:2015cv20555
Plaintiff:
George Martin-Trigona
Defendant:
Nestor Felepe Dela Cruz-Munoz, Dan Snyden, Samantha Helm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Posr v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv00584
Defendant:
City of New York, Con Ed Revenue Specialist Anthony Pollina, Judge Donna M. Golia and others
Plaintiff:
Posr A. Posr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HAMILTON v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 4:2014cv00651
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAMILTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, SETERUS INC, POPKIN & ROSALER PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latimore v. Pickell et al
as 2:2014cv13997
Plaintiff:
Javin Latimore
Defendant:
Robert Pickell, James Gage, Peter Alfaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jemsek v. North Carolina et al
as 5:2014cv00504
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jemsek
Defendant:
State of North Carolina , North Carolina Medical Board , Janelle R Rhyne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Zaimi v. Levy et al
as 7:2014cv06338
Plaintiff:
Lani Zaimi
Defendant:
Adam Levy, The Putnam County District Attorney's Office, The County of Putnam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RONE v. WINSTON-SALEM FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 1:2014cv00602
Plaintiff:
VICTORIOUS RONE
Defendant:
WINSTON-SALEM FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, PAUL PURYEAR and ART PASCAL, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pascal Etcheber v. FBI
as 14-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PASCAL ANDRE ETCHEBER
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID ESPIE, Counter Intelligence Special Agent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
