Cases 71 - 80 of 269
Frank Dortch v. York County Children and Youth, et al
as 17-3793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK JERRID DORTCH
Defendant - Appellee:
YORK COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES, PAUL THORNE, IRENE FRANZIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-56833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joe Raseknia v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 17-56733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE RASEKNIA
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PROBATION DEPARTMENT and DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Bellotti v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv01981
Plaintiff:
Gary Vincent Bellotti
Defendant:
Richard Williams, Placer County Probation Department and Placer County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Land v. El Mirage Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv03169
Plaintiff:
Ashley Land
Defendant:
El Mirage Police Department, Unknown Chairez, Charles Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Creek v. Franklin County et al
as 1:2017cv01304
Plaintiff:
Pattie K. Creek
Defendant:
Franklin County and Franklin County Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ariana Amore v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv05207
Defendant:
Oscar Calderon, Jr., Los Angeles County Probation Department, Does 1 to 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Ariana Amore
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Tamez v. Cochise County Attorneys Office et al
as 4:2017cv00249
Plaintiff:
Mario Tamez
Defendant:
Cochise County Attorneys Office, Southern Eastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services, Cochise County Adult Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
