Cases 71 - 80 of 224
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv07139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02571
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02569
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Yan Sui, et al v. Richard Marshack, et al
as 17-56323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YAN SUI and PEI-YU YANG
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD ALAN MARSHACK, an individual, MARSHACK & HAYS, LLC, a California Corporation, CLARENCE YOSHIKANE, an individual and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Parents and Friends, Inc. v. First Equity, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02091
Plaintiff:
Parents and Friends, Inc.
Defendant:
First Equity, Inc., Josie Victoria Swenson, Wells Fargo Bank NA as Trustee of the Josephine M Round Trust under Agreement dated April 18, 1996 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Andrew Clark v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, et al
as 17-35247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW G. CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, CITY OF EUGENE, Police Department/Police Auditor, LANE COUNTY, Sheriff's Department and Jail and others
Michael Boyd v. Experian Information Solutions, et al
as 17-10166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and WELLS FARGO BANK, NA
Carl Hulick v. State of California et al
as 8:2017cv00010
Defendant:
Clariben Huntington, P Assets Inc, State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Hulick
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
