Cases 81 - 90 of 148
DUNCAN v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2014cv04020
Plaintiff:
JASON DUNCAN
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, GIOVANNI BOVE, RICHIE LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Justice et al
as 1:2014cv00516
Plaintiff:
Carl E Jackson
Defendant:
U S Dept of Justice, Eric H Holder, Jr, Robert J Moossey, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Jackson et al v. Justice et al
as 1:2014cv00408
Plaintiff:
Ian J Jackson
Defendant:
U S Dept of Justice, Eric H Holder, Jr, Robert J Moossey, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Parker et al v. Lawrence County Drug Task Force et al
as 2:2013cv01459
Plaintiff:
Jacob Parker , Terry McDonald , Tony Joseph and others
Defendant:
Lawrence County Drug Task Force, Lawrence County Sheriffs Dept, Gene Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnhart v. Village of Buckner, Illinois et al
as 3:2013cv00772
Plaintiff:
Susan Barnhart
Defendant:
Village of Buckner, Illinois, William McKinney , City of Christopher, Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-16278
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-16259
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SEWELL et al v. DUBS et al
as 1:2013cv01212
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Sewell and Kristen H. Sewell
Defendant:
Dwayne Dubs, Daniel S. Bowman, Hanover Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
