Cases 81 - 90 of 497
Thistle v. The State of Alabama
as 3:2021cv02073
Plaintiff:
David John Thistle
Defendant:
The State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellison v. State of Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 2:2021cv00716
Plaintiff:
Billy Keith Ellison
Defendant:
State of Alabama, State of Missouri, State of Utah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams Jr v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv03543
Defendant:
State of Oregon, State of Missouri, State of South Carolina and others
Petitioner:
Andy Hope Williams Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Wood v. City of Montgomery et al (MAG+)
as 2:2021cv00465
Plaintiff:
Freddie Eugene Wood, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Montgomery County, Alabama, Daryl Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellison v. State of Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 2:2021cv00439
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, State of Minnesota, State of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweeting v. Delorme et al
as 1:2021cv00132
Defendant:
State of Alabama DHR, Shauna Delorme and Jeanuth Wright
Plaintiff:
Eric Sweeting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vares v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv00148
Defendant:
Timothy James Ritchie Trust, Benjamin Howard Albritton, C. Joseph Norton and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Vares
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Martin v. Jefferson County Department of Human Resources for State of Alabama
as 2:2021cv00175
Defendant:
U.S. Secretary of Treasury, Jefferson County Department of Human Resources and Jefferson County Department of Human Resources for State of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Tramaine E. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. State of Alabama DHR
as 1:2021cv00085
Defendant:
State of Alabama DHR
Plaintiff:
Virgil Mitchell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
