Cases 1 - 10 of 2,023
WATSON v. REESE et al
as 2:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
ERIC JASON WATSON
Defendant:
DEPUTY CODY REESE and PROBATION OFFICER KEN STAHL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON v. BEAVER COUNTY, PA et al
as 2:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
ERIC JASON WATSON
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY, PA, BEAVER COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, BEAVER COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON v. SOMERSET COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
MILLAR WATSON
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY, DALE P LANCASTER, MICHAEL PIKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Marquez v. Baker-Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Marquez
Defendant:
Amber Baker-Chavez, Elizabeth O-Rourke, Gerard Lavelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
