Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Mobley v. Birk
as 3:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Victoria Mobley
Defendant:
Cecilia Fannon Birk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12455
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Marino v. Beccera et al
as 3:2017cv05118
Plaintiff:
Daniel Marino
Defendant:
Xavier Beccera, Contra Costa County Department of Child Support Services, Alameda County Department of Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Via et al v. Advanced Call Center Technologies, LLC
as 2:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
Vanessa R Via and Crystal Fannon
Defendant:
Advanced Call Center Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Jeffrey Woods, et al v. Ernie Moore, et al
as 11-3147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERY A. WOODS
Defendant - Appellee:
ERNIE L. MOORE, Warden, HUGH QUILL, MONA PARKS and others
Richard Nevitt v. Cynthia Bradley, et al
as 09-35503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD L. NEVITT, AKA Shakur abdel-Haleem
Defendant - Appellee:
CYNTHIA BRADLEY, MORGAN CHRISTEN, RACHEL GERNAT and others
The State of Ohio ex rel. Dana Skaggs et al v. Brunner et al
as 2:2008cv01077
Plaintiff:
The State of Ohio ex rel. Dana Skaggs, The State of Ohio ex rel. Dana Skaggs, The State of Ohio ex rel. Dana Skaggs and others
Defendant:
Jennifer L. Brunner, Jennifer L. Brunner, Jennifer L. Brunner and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nevitt v. State of Alaska et al
as 3:2008cv00226
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Nevitt
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Cynthia Bradley, Robert Heun and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
